Explore the data

Cookie Policy


Last updated: 16 November 2020

This Cookies Policy explains what Cookies are and how We use them. You should read this policy so You can understand what type of cookies We use, or the information We collect using Cookies and how that information is used.

We do not use Cookies that contain any information that personally identifies a user.

We do not store sensitive personal information, such as mailing addresses, account passwords, etc. in the Cookies We use.

Interpretation and Definitions

Interpretation

The words of which the initial letter is capitalised have meanings defined under the following conditions. The following definitions shall have the same meaning regardless of whether they appear in singular or in plural.

Definitions

For the purposes of this Cookies Policy:

  • Company (referred to as either "the Company", "We", "Us" or "Our" in this Cookies Policy) refers to MIF Services UK, 35 Portman Square, London W1H 6LR.
  • Cookies means small files that are placed on Your computer, mobile device or any other device by a website, containing details of your browsing history on that website among its many uses.
  • Website refers to IIAG data portal, accessible at https://iiag.online
  • You means the individual accessing or using the Website, or a company, or any legal entity on behalf of which such individual is accessing or using the Website, as applicable.

The use of the Cookies

Type of Cookies We Use

Cookies can be "Persistent" or "Session" Cookies. Persistent Cookies remain on your personal computer or mobile device when You go offline, while Session Cookies are deleted as soon as You close your web browser.

We use both session and persistent Cookies for the purposes set out below:

  • Necessary / Essential Cookies Type: Session Cookies Administered by: Us Purpose: These Cookies are essential to provide You with services available through the Website and to enable You to use some of its features. They help to authenticate users and prevent fraudulent use of user accounts. Without these Cookies, the services that You have asked for cannot be provided, and We only use these Cookies to provide You with those services.
  • Functionality Cookies Type: Persistent Cookies Administered by: Us Purpose: These Cookies allow us to remember choices You make when You use the Website, such as remembering your login details or language preference. The purpose of these Cookies is to provide You with a more personal experience and to avoid You having to re-enter your preferences every time You use the Website.

Your Choices Regarding Cookies

If You prefer to avoid the use of Cookies on the Website, first You must disable the use of Cookies in your browser and then delete the Cookies saved in your browser associated with this website. You may use this option for preventing the use of Cookies at any time.

If You do not accept Our Cookies, You may experience some inconvenience in your use of the Website and some features may not function properly.

If You'd like to delete Cookies or instruct your web browser to delete or refuse Cookies, please visit the help pages of your web browser.

For the Chrome web browser, please visit this page from Google: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/32050

For the Internet Explorer web browser, please visit this page from Microsoft: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/278835 For the Firefox web browser, please visit this page from Mozilla: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/delete-cookies-remove-info-websites-stored

For the Safari web browser, please visit this page from Apple: https://support.apple.com/guide/safari/manage-cookies-and-website-data-sfri11471/mac

For any other web browser, please visit your web browser's official web pages.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Cookies Policy, You can contact us via https://mo.ibrahim.foundation/about-us/contact

{country}
{country}

About {classification}


The 2018 IIAG focuses on assessing country trends in the last five years (2013-2017), within the context of the last decade (2008-2017). Whilst a country can either improve or deteriorate over the decade, the trend displayed in recent years shows important and useful characteristics for analysis.

Whilst registering improvement over the decade, a country can, over the last five years:

Increase its rate of improvement;
Slow its rate of improvement;
Show recent decline.

Similarly, a country showing decline over the decade can, over the last five years:

Increase its rate of decline;
Slow its rate of decline;
Show recent improvement.

In order to capture these ‘trends within trends’, countries are classified according to the direction and size of their annual average trend in the most recent five years, compared to the direction and size of their annual average trend shown over a decade.

The time periods used for analysis are:

Ten-year period: 2008-2017
Five-year period: 2013-2017

Where trends are static (show no change), the following classifications are applied: Static (over ten years) to decline (over five years): ‘Warning Signs’ | Improve (over ten years) to static (over five years): ‘Warning Signs’ | Decline (over ten years) to static (over five years): ‘Bouncing Back’ | Static (over ten years) to improve (over five years): ‘Bouncing Back’

A 'No Change' classification is applied in three instances. 1. When the annual average trend is exactly the same in both periods (if annual average trend appears the same but a classification is given, differences will exist beyond the second decimal place). 2. When a country/group achieves the best possible score (100.0) in 2012 and in 2016. 3. When a country/group achieves the worst possible score (0.0) in 2012 and 2016. In these latter two, no classification can be applied as scores cannot go higher or lower.

‘Not classified’ is applied when a country achieves the best possible score of 100.0 after 2013 and maintains it until 2017, or the worst possible score of 0.0 after 2013 and maintains it until 2017, or country data is not available for 2008, 2013 or 2017. In these instances it is not deemed that the characteristics of the trends match any classifications.

{measureName}

{rank_2010} {rank_2011} {rank_2012} {rank_2013} {rank_2014} {rank_2015} {rank_2016} {rank_2017} {rank_2018} {rank_2019} {rank_change} {score_2010} {score_2011} {score_2012} {score_2013} {score_2014} {score_2015} {score_2016} {score_2017} {score_2018} {score_2019} {score_range_1} {score_range_2} {score_change_1} {score_change_2}
Loading...

About {location}


Region: {region}

REC membership(s): {memberships}

2020 IIAG Summary

Overall governance

{governance_summary}

Comparison to average scores

{comparison_summary}

Highest & lowest scores

{highest_lowest_summary}

Close

Sorry, it is only possible to compare results for up to four locations

You have already selected:
{selected_locations}

Public Perception of Overall Governance

About Citizens’ Voices


As citizens are the recipients of public leadership and governance, the assessment of governance performance needs to be rooted on results for citizens and cannot just rely on official and expert assessment data.

MIF has been working with and supporting Afrobarometer, the leading pan-African research institution conducting public attitude surveys on the continent, and the 2020 IIAG framework gives these more prominence. Formerly scattered at various levels in the IIAG, citizens’ assessments of various governance components are now highlighted in a new, specific IIAG section, providing a comprehensive ‘reality check’ to complement the IIAG results.

This section mirrors the IIAG categories and provides public perception data on the closest proxies to the IIAG measures. However, whilst these measures are available to compare across the IIAG, it is important to note that their scores do not form part of the calculation for Overall Governance.

Measure Overview

Rename this view

 

About Quick Selection


Use these links to quickly select multiple measures at once.

Please note that this will not select any measures from the Citizens’ Voices section. To add those, simply scroll down to Public Perception of Overall Governance and use the quick select options there.

About this chart


Radar (or spider) charts are used to plot one or more groups of values over multiple common variables. Each variable has its own axis, and all axes are joined in the centre of the figure. Data from a single set of results are plotted along each axis and connected to form a polygon.

This radial chart compares the 16 IIAG sub-category scores in latest data year (2019) for the location of choice, alongside the African average scores.

Invalid Selection


The table and graph views allow you to compare one measure across many locations or multiple measures for a single location.

You have selected multiple locations and multiple measures

Please change your selection to select a single measure or single location.

Sorry, it is only possible to compare multiple locations against a single measure

You already have several measures selected. If you wish to compare these locations, select a single measure from the ones you have previously chosen:

  • Item 1
  • Item 2

Or keep your selected measures

Too Many Measures


Sorry, it is currently only possible to view the map for a single measure

Please change your selection to select a single measure.

Invalid Selection


Due to the number of items you have selected, it is not possible to produce an overview display.

When a single location is selected, the limit for measures is six. When a single measure is viewed, the limit for locations is four.

{inner}
{location}

{subject}

{score} Out of 100.0
{trend}
Ranking
{rank} Out of {countries_with_rank}

2018 Ibrahim Index of African Governance | iiag.online

{headline}
{subjects}

{subject}

{score} Out of 100.0
Trend {change_at} {change_aat} {change_0} AAT since 2010
{change_1} AAT since {since_year_1}
Absolute trend since 2010
Ranking
{rank} Out of {countries_with_rank}

{child}

{ch}

Out of 100.0

{headline}
About {headline}
{score_markup}

Ranking

{ranking}

Out of {countries_with_rank}


Trend {overall_change_at} {overall_change_aat}

Absolute trend since 2010

{change_0} AAT since 2010
{change_1} AAT since 2015

Placeholder


Awaiting content

{sub_name} scores
{inner_content}

{subject}

{score}

Out of 100.0

Trend {subject} for {location} {ch_at} {ch_aat} {change_0} AAT since 2010
{change_1} AAT since 2015
Absolute trend since 2010
  • {level_4_name}
  • {level_5_name}
  • {level_3_name}
      {level_4_content}
  • About {subject}