Top 10 countries
(2021)
('12-'21)
Bottom 10 countries
(2021)
('12-'21)
Most improved countries
(2021)
('12-'21)
Most deteriorated countries
(2021)
('12-'21)
Please select a country to find out more about it.
Please select a measure below to find out more about it.
Please select your measure(s) below. You can choose single or multiple measures all the way down to indicator level. Please note, it is not possible to compare multiple measures with multiple locations.
Please select your location(s) below. You can choose single or multiple countries or groups of countries. Please note, it is not possible to compare multiple countries when you have more than one measure selected.
This sub-sub-indicator assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities. The expenditure component consists of two sub-components, one focusing on measurement issues and the other on priorities and strategies, especially those related to the poor and to vulnerable groups. The first (i) covers the extent to which poverty measurement, monitoring, and evaluation instruments exist and the degree to which poverty-related information is made available to the public. The second (ii) assesses the extent to which vulnerable groups are identified, priorities are spelled out and budgets are aligned with those priorities and sub-national allocation of public spending takes into account sub-national levels of poverty. The assessment of the revenue collection, the third (iii) dimension of the criterion, covers the incidence of major taxes, e.g., whether they are progressive or regressive, the extent to which progressive changes have been incorporated in the revenue system, the degree of alignment between revenue collection and poverty reduction priorities.
View full country tableAs citizens are the recipients of public leadership and governance, the assessment of governance performance of the IIAG is accompanied by the Citizens’ Voices dataset in an effort to contextualise the official and expert assessment data in the IIAG with the reality on the ground as perceived by citizens.
MIF has been working with and supporting Afrobarometer, the leading pan-African research institution conducting public opinion surveys on the continent, and the 2022 IIAG framework gives these more prominence. Formerly scattered at various levels in the IIAG, citizens’ assessments of various governance components are now highlighted in a Citizens’ Voices section, providing a comprehensive 'reality check' to complement the IIAG results.
This section mirrors the IIAG categories and provides public perception data on the closest proxies to the IIAG measures. However, whilst these measures are available to compare across the IIAG, it is important to note that their scores do not form part of the calculation for Overall Governance.
Use these links to quickly select multiple measures at once.